Perceptions of General Surgery Program Leadership and Residents on Research Sabbatical.

INTRODUCTION: The incorporation of a 1-y- or 2-y research period during general surgery residency is increasingly common in many academic programs, yet often, it is heterogeneously structured and ill-defined. This survey-based observational study aimed to characterize the perceptions of general surgery program directors (PDs) and residents regarding an in-training, dedicated research sabbatical. METHODS: Two surveys were conducted using Qualtrics software. One survey was sent to general surgery residency PDs, and the other was sent to general surgery residents currently on a research sabbatical. The primary aim of the survey was to assess the PDs' and research residents' perceptions of the research sabbatical. RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifty-two surveys were analyzed, of which 120 were from PDs and 632 from research residents. Among the residents, 44.1% felt that the research time delayed their surgical training. Regarding research funding, 46.7% of the responding residents said that their residency program funded their research, 30.9% said they acquired funding independently, and 19.1% said that it came from a combination of residency program and independent funding. Finally, regarding how residents found their research opportunity, 42.7% said they found it independently and 53.3% said their program provided it. CONCLUSIONS: Research sabbaticals during residency may be considered essential to academic development. However, in this survey-based study, perceptions of research time and its structure varied greatly between PDs and residents. An intentional push toward developing guidelines for research sabbaticals may benefit residency program leadership and residents.

Understanding How Experts Do It: A Conceptual Framework for the Open Transversus Abdominis Release Procedure.

BACKGROUND: The safe and effective performance of a posterior component separation via a transversus abdominis release (TAR) requires intraoperative judgement and decision-making skills that are difficult to define, standardize, and teach. We herein present the first qualitative study which builds a framework upon which training and objective evaluation of a TAR can be based. METHODS: Hierarchical and cognitive task analyses for a TAR procedure were performed using semistructured interviews of hernia experts to describe the thoughts and behaviors that exemplify optimal performance. Verbal data was recorded, transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: A conceptual framework was synthesized based on literary sources (4 book chapters, 4 peer-reviewed articles, 3 online videos), 2 field observations, and interviews of 4 hernia experts [median 66 minutes (44-78)]. Subject matter experts practiced a median of 6.5 years (1.5-16) and have completed a median of 300 (60-500) TARs. After 5 rounds of inductive analysis, 80 subtasks, 86 potential errors, 36 cognitive behaviors, and 17 decision points were identified and categorized into 10 procedural steps (midline laparotomy, adhesiolysis, retrorectus dissection, etc.) and 9 fundamental principles: patient physiology and disease burden; tactical modification; tissue reconstruction and wound healing; task completion; choice of technique and instruments; safe planes and danger zones; exposure, ergonomics, environmental limitations; anticipation and forward planning; and tissue trauma and handling. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to define the key tasks, decisions, and cognitive behaviors that are essential to a successful TAR procedure.

The American College of Surgeons Entering Resident Readiness Assessment (ACS ERRA): Validity Evidence From a Three-Year National Study.

OBJECTIVE: To gather validity evidence supporting the use and interpretation of scores from the American College of Surgeons Entering Resident Readiness Assessment (ACS ERRA) Program. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: ACS ERRA is an online formative assessment program developed to assess entering surgery residents' ability to make critical clinical decisions, and includes 12 clinical areas and 20 topics identified by a national panel of surgeon educators and residency program directors. METHODS: Data from 3 national testing administrations of ACS ERRA (2018-2020) were used to gather validity evidence regarding content, response process, internal structure (reliability), relations to other variables, and consequences. RESULTS: Over the 3 administrations, 1975 surgery residents participated from 125 distinct residency programs. Overall scores [Mean = 64% (SD = 7%)] remained consistent across the 3 years ( P = 0.670). There were no significant differences among resident characteristics (gender, age, international medical graduate status). The mean case discrimination index was 0.54 [SD = 0.15]. Kappa inter-rater reliability for scoring was 0.87; the overall test score reliability (G-coefficient) was 0.86 (Ф-coefficient = 0.83). Residents who completed residency readiness programs had higher ACS ERRA scores (66% versus 63%, Cohen's d = 0.23, P < 0.001). On average, 15% of decisions made (21/140 per test) involved potentially harmful actions. Variability in scores from graduating medical schools (7%) carried over twice as much weight than from matched residency programs (3%). CONCLUSIONS: ACS ERRA scores provide valuable information to entering surgery residents and surgery program directors to aid in development of individual and group learning plans.

Resident Readiness for Senior Level Decision Making: Identifying the Domains for Formative Assessment and Feedback.

OBJECTIVE: To establish expert consensus regarding the domains and topics for senior surgery residents (PGY-4) to make critical decisions and assume senior-level responsibilities, and to develop the formative American College of Surgeons Senior Resident Readiness Assessment (ACS SRRA) Program. DESIGN: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) education leadership team conducted a focus group with surgical experts to identify the content for an assessment tool to evaluate senior residents' readiness for their increased levels of responsibility. After the focus group, national experts were recruited to develop consensus on the topics through three rounds of surveys using Delphi methodology. The Delphi participants rated topics using Likert-type scales and their comments were incorporated into subsequent rounds. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement with internal-consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) ≥ 0.8. In a stepwise fashion, topics that did not achieve consensus for inclusion were removed from subsequent survey rounds. SETTING: The surveys were administered via an online questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve program directors and assistant program directors made up the focus group. The 39 Delphi participants represented seven different surgical subspecialties and were from diverse practice settings. The median length of experience in general surgery resident education was 20 years (IQR 14.3-30.0) with 64% of the experts being either current or past general surgery residency program directors. RESULTS: The response rate was 100% and Cronbach's alpha was ≥ 0.9 for each round. The Delphi participants contributed a large number of comments. Of the 201 topics that were evaluated initially, 120 topics in 25 core clinical areas were included to create the final domains of ACS SRRA. CONCLUSIONS: National consensus on the domain of the ACS SRRA has been achieved via the modified Delphi method among expert surgeon educators. ACS SRRA will identify clinical topics and areas in which each senior resident needs improvement and provide data to residents and residency programs to develop individualized learning plans. This would help in preparing the senior residents to assume their responsibilities and support their readiness for future fellowship training or surgical practice.

Evaluating General Surgical Residency Education Structure and Incorporation of the Resident as Educator Model.

BACKGROUND: General surgery education has continued to evolve regarding test preparation, simulation, and skill acquisition. The "Resident as Educator" (RAE) model has been proposed and enacted by programs as a viable education model for general surgery education. This study examines the current education structures in general surgery residency programs in the United States and how many programs have adopted the RAE model or aspects of the model. METHODS: A 20-question survey regarding education structure was distributed to all program directors in October 2021. Questions focused on the involvement of residents in leading education sessions, creating the weekly education schedule, program feedback to residents on teaching, and recognition for distinguished resident educators. RESULTS: A total of 156 programs responded to the survey. The response rate was 60%. 76.4% of the respondents have a combination of resident and faculty-led didactic sessions, 8.5% have an RAE model, and 15% have faculty-led education sessions. In terms of concerns regarding resident-led didactics-24.4% of respondents stated that their main concern would be the quality of education provided, and 20.4% referenced low resident satisfaction levels with resident-led education. There were no differences among the groups regarding the American Board of Surgery board passage rates. CONCLUSIONS: Most residency programs have adopted a model in which residents have significant involvement in creating and maintaining the education calendar and leading formal education sessions. However, only 8.5% have a purely resident-led educational curriculum among the responding programs. More studies are needed to assess how to implement a resident as educator model successfully.

Selecting the Next Generation of Surgeons: General Surgery Program Directors and Coordinators Perspective on USMLE Changes and Holistic Approach.

INTRODUCTION: The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) was designed as a universal assessment tool for states to determine physician's medical licensure's candidacy. Recent changes in the USMLE exam have changed the way future surgical residency candidate applications will be reviewed. The survey aimed to assess the effect of changes in USMLE exams-USMLE Step 1 pass/fail, complete dissolution of USMLE clinical skills exam, and the role of holistic review in future surgical residency candidacy selection. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was created and distributed to general surgery program directors and coordinators across the USA. The survey aimed to assess attitudes toward changes to USMLE exams and the potential changes with a holistic review of candidate applications. RESULTS: The response rate was 63.7%. Most program directors and coordinators disagree with changing USMLE Step 1 to a pass/fail scoring system. The majority felt that contacts, the medical school's name, and performance in clinical electives and sub-internships would hold more significance. They also believe that a holistic review of application will decrease socioeconomic discrepancies and promote a more diverse and inclusive resident cohort. CONCLUSION: Step 2 clinical knowledge (CK) will gain more importance in future residency matches because of the change in the scoring system of Step 1. The medical school's name, personal contacts, and clinical performance in rotations will hold more significance.

The Biology and Psychology of Surgical Learning.

Surgical education requires proficiency with multiple types of learning to create capable surgeons. This article reviews a conceptual framework of learning that starts with the biological basis of learning and how neural networks encode memory. We then focus on how information can be absorbed, organized, and recalled, discussing concepts such as cognitive load, knowledge retrieval, and adult learning. Influences on memory and learning such as stress, sleep, and unconscious bias are explored. This overview of the biological and psychological aspects to learning provides a foundation for the articles to follow.

A Nationwide Survey Study on Medical Student Experience in Acute Care Surgery.

BACKGROUND: There is little known about medical student education in acute care surgery (ACS)-how much and what type of exposure students receive in the specialty. The aim of this study was to investigate the current status of ACS education provided to students in U.S. medical schools. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We created an online survey tool covering the surgical clerkship and ACS curriculum and distributed this survey to the official email list of the Association for Surgical Education Committee on Clerkship Directors. RESULTS: A total of 57 of 294 (19.4%) responses were received. All respondents reported that at least some of their major teaching hospitals are affiliated with an ACS service and have a level 1 or 2 trauma center. Although almost two-thirds (61.8%) of respondents believe that medical students should have formal ACS education in the form of a clinical rotation, an ACS rotation is mandatory at only 16.4% of programs and is optional at 69.1% of programs as part of the surgical clerkship curriculum. The duration of ACS rotations ranges from 1 to 6 wk, and half of programs require students to take overnight call (most often 1-2 nights/wk). The most common pathologies that students see on ACS include appendicitis, biliary disease and cholecystitis, intestinal obstruction, and trauma. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students across the nation have varying exposure to ACS during their clinical training. With the continued growth of the ACS specialty, further study is warranted to examine the impact of undergraduate ACS education on student career planning.

Effect of COVID-19 on Surgical Training Across the United States: A National Survey of General Surgery Residents.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 emerged as a global pandemic in 2020 and has affected millions of lives. Surgical training has also been significantly affected by this pandemic, but the exact effect remains unknown. We sought to perform a national survey of general surgery residents in the United States to assess the effect of COVID-19 on surgical resident training, education, and burnout. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was created and distributed to general surgery residents across the United States. The survey aimed to assess changes to surgical residents' clinical schedules, operative volume, and educational curricula as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, we sought to assess the impact of COVID-19 on resident burnout. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and two general surgery residents completed the survey. Residents reported a significant decline in the number of cases performed during the pandemic. Educational curricula were largely shifted toward online didactics. The majority of residents reported spending more time on educational didactics than before the pandemic. The majority of residents feared contracting COVID-19 or transmitting it to their family during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 has had significant impact on surgical training and education. One positive consequence of the pandemic is increased educational didactics. Online didactics should continue to be a part of surgical education in the post-COVID-19 era. Steps need to be taken to ensure that graduating surgical residents are adequately prepared for fellowship and independent practice despite the significantly decreased case volumes during this pandemic. Surgery training programs should focus on providing nontechnical clinical training and professional development during this time.

Development and emergency implementation of an online surgical education curriculum for a General Surgery program during a global pandemic: The University of Southern California experience.

BACKGROUND: Physical distancing required by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has limited traditional in-person resident education. We present our novel online curriculum for incorporation into traditional surgical educational programs. METHODS: The online curriculum utilized weekly sub-specialty themed faculty and resident created lectures, ABSITE practice questions, and weekly sub-specialty synchronized readings. Attendance, resident and faculty surveys, and completed ABSITE practice questions evaluated for curriculum success. Curriculum was adapted as COVID-19 clinical restructuring ended. RESULTS: 77% and 80% of clinical residents attended faculty lectures and resident led topic discussions as compared to 66% and 48% attending traditional in-person grand rounds and SCORE curriculum (both p > 0.05). 71.9% of residents and 16.6% of faculty reported improved resident participation while none reported decreased levels of participation (p < 0.001). 87.1% of residents and 66.7% of faculty preferred the online curriculum (p = 0.374). Completed ABSITE practice questions per resident increased from 21 to 31 questions/week (p = 0.541). CONCLUSION: Our online educational curriculum demonstrates success and can serve as a model for online restructuring of resident education.

Applying the science of learning to the teaching and learning of surgical skills: The basics of surgical education.

The changing climate of surgical education has led to a renewed interest in the process of learning. Research from the fields of cognitive and educational psychology, neuroscience, sociology, and behavioral economics have clear implications for the teaching and learning of psychomotor skills. This article summarizes how key learning theories impact the field of surgical education and proposes practical tips, supported by the science of learning, that can be applied to optimize resident and fellow education.

Practical Bioethics for the Humanitarian Surgeon: The Development, Implementation and Assessment of an Ethics Curriculum for Residents Participating in Humanitarian Missions.

BACKGROUND: Humanitarian surgeons face many ethical challenges. Despite increasing resident participation during humanitarian activities, minimal literature exists describing premission ethics training. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify publications on humanitarian surgery. A 3-tiered review was performed assessing for ethical conflicts and guidelines. A Humanitarian Ethics Curriculum (HEC) was developed based on these findings and administered to residents prior to a humanitarian mission. Postmission essays were assigned to describe an ethical dilemma they encountered. The HEC's value was evaluated by identifying the ACGME core competencies represented in the essays. RESULTS: 49 eligible publications were identified. Several areas of consensus were found. Controversies identified included: trainee involvement, surgical innovation, and operating on patients with dismal prognosis. All residents stated that the HEC was vital. 61% of ethical dilemmas involved surgical patients. Core competencies emphasized included systems-based practice, patient care, professionalism, interpersonal/communication skills, and medical knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: There is consensus regarding ethical principles that surgeons should follow during humanitarian activities. However, areas of controversy persist. Premission HEC should be administered to residents participating in humanitarian missions.

Acute Care Surgery Education in US Medical Schools: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature and Report of a Medical Student Experience.

OBJECTIVE: There is currently little known about acute care surgery (ACS) education in US medical schools. The purpose of this paper was to systematically review the state of the literature describing ACS training at the medical school level and introduce an ACS education model provided to medical students at our institution. DESIGN: We conducted a comprehensive literature review using the PubMed database to identify all articles related to ACS (trauma surgery, emergency general surgery, and surgical critical care) and undergraduate medical education. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 376 articles were captured with our search strategy. The articles were reviewed for eligibility by 2 separate reviewers. RESULTS: We identified 3 relevant articles for our literature review. All studies were performed at level 1 trauma centers. The duration of ACS rotations ranges from 1 to 4 weeks with variable night call schedules. While several curricular changes have improved student perceptions on ACS education, none of the studies have thoroughly evaluated the impact on students' readiness or career choices for their postgraduate training. CONCLUSIONS: The current lack of information on ACS education in medical school has left us with a need to better understand this area in order to improve students' experience and exposure to the specialty. Future efforts should be placed on addressing current issues in ACS education and evaluating its impact on career choice of medical students.

The American College of Surgeons Entering Resident Readiness Assessment Program: Development and National Pilot Testing Results.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the readiness of entering residents for clinical responsibilities, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Division of Education developed the "Entering Resident Readiness Assessment" (ACS-ERRA) Program. SUMMARY BACKGROUND: ACS-ERRA is an online formative assessment that uses a key features approach to measure clinical decision-making skills and focuses on cases encountered at the beginning of residency. Results can be used to develop learning plans to address areas that may need reinforcement. METHODS: A national panel of 16 content experts, 3 medical educators, and a psychometrician developed 98 short, key features cases. Each case required medical knowledge to be applied appropriately at challenging decision points during case management. Four pilot testing studies were conducted sequentially to gather validity evidence. RESULTS: Residents from programs across the United States participated in the studies (n = 58, 20, 87, 154, respectively). Results from the pilot studies enabled improvements after each pilot test. For the psychometric pilot (final pilot test), 2 parallel test forms of the ACS-ERRA were administered, each containing 40 cases, resulting in overall mean testing time of 2 hours 2 minutes (SD = 43 min). The mean test score was 61% (SD = 9%) and the G-coefficient reliability was 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: Results can be used to identify strengths and weaknesses in residents' decision-making skills and yield valuable information to create individualized learning plans. The data can also support efforts directed at the transition into residency training and inform discussions about levels of supervision. In addition, surgery program directors can use the aggregate test results to make curricular changes.

A Preoperative Educational Time-Out is Associated with Improved Resident Goal Setting and Strengthens Educational Experiences.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a preoperative Educational Time-Out (ETO) with structured postoperative feedback on resident preoperative goal-setting and the educational experience of a clinical rotation. DESIGN: A preoperative ETO was developed during which trainees and faculty jointly identified an operative goal and discussed the trainee's operative autonomy. Postoperative feedback with a smartphone application was encouraged. From November 2016 to October 2017, the intervention was piloted with 1 surgical service. Outcomes included ETO completion rate, goal setting rate, and subjects' perception of the impact of the ETO on identification of performance deficits, trainee autonomy, and receipt of feedback. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. SETTING: This study was performed in an institutional hospital setting. PARTICIPANTS: Third-year general surgery residents and surgical faculty in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center took part in the intervention. RESULTS: Seven residents and 7 attending surgeons participated in this study. Residents performed a median of 15 procurements during an average of 6.5 weeks each on service. The ETO completion rate was 83%. Resident-reported preoperative goal setting increased after the intervention (from 36% to 78%, p = 0.015). Subjects reported a positive impact of the intervention, with high resident agreement that the ETO helped identify deficits (82% median agreement), increased autonomy (82% median agreement), and increased receipt of feedback (84% median agreement). Residents and attendings agreed that the educational experience was stronger due to the ETO (median 81% and 77%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The ETO intervention improved rates of resident preoperative goal setting and strengthened perceived educational experiences. Resident participants also reported improvements in autonomy and rates of postoperative feedback. Broader implementation of this brief preoperative pause is an easy way to emphasize procedural education in the operating room.

Building a Framework for Self-Regulated Learning in Surgical Education: A Delphi Consensus Among Experts in Surgical Education.

OBJECTIVE: Practice-Based Learning and Improvement is a Core Competency for surgical residents. Self-regulated learning (SRL) skills are an important component of this competency, yet are rarely taught in surgical training. Before we can teach SRL skills to residents we must understand the attributes that are essential. The purpose of this study was to develop a framework for SRL for surgical trainees. DESIGN: This mixed-methods study design utilized a two-round modified-Delphi approach to develop consensus among experts in surgical education regarding SRL in surgical training. Round One included SRL constructs derived from educational, professional, and medical literature. Based upon quantitative data and thematic coding of comments, these constructs were adapted for applicability in the context of surgical residency and reorganized using a constant comparative approach. Revised constructs and groupings were presented to the expert panel in Round Two. Further survey rounds were not needed as all items in Round Two reached the predetermined consensus level of 70%. SETTING: The Delphi panel was a purposeful sample of nationally recognized experts in surgical education, including members of the Association for Surgical Education and the Association for Program Directors in Surgery. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight of 42 experts (90.5%) responded to Round One, representing 29 academic and community medical systems nationally. The response rate for Round Two was 92%, 35 of the 38 Round One participants. RESULTS: In Round One, the SRL constructs were all viewed as important with median scores ranging from 50 to 99.5, on a 100-point scale. Two hundred and ninety-one comments were coded and used to refine SRL definitions into 7 domains for Round Two, which included self-awareness, task analysis, situation awareness, strategic planning, progress evaluation, learning and performance management, and goal attainment and refinement. All Round Two items reached greater than 70% agreement, and received 51 free response comments. Several key themes emerged: clinical prioritization over learning, learner's limited control, value and reliance on external resources, low use of metacognition, and complex goal orientation. Incorporation of common themes generated a novel multi-stage framework of SRL in surgical education. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical residency represents a unique learning context, in which the ideal learner is one who understands their learning environment and utilizes available resources to optimize their own learning. Experts in surgical education believe SRL skills are important in training, and a novel framework of SRL is necessary to support a learner-centered model within the demanding environment of surgical training.

Preoperative goal setting and perioperative communication in an academic training institution: Where do we stand?

BACKGROUND: We collected data regarding specific aspects of perioperative surgical education within our institution's Section of Surgical Sciences as a needs assessment. METHODS: Categorical general surgery residents and attending surgeons were queried regarding their perceptions of resident preoperative planning and perioperative communication. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 81%, with 35 resident and 54 faculty respondents. Residents reported selecting an operative learning objective a median of 50% (IQR 36-67) of the time, whereas attending surgeons perceived this to be the case a median of 26% (IQR 15-35) of the time (P < 0.001). The group reported median frequencies of 20% (IQR 9-31) for preoperative discussion of learning objectives, 12% (IQR 4-27) for preoperative discussion of competence and 27% (IQR 17-55) for postoperative debriefing. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates deficits in resident goal setting and perioperative communication within our program, which are targets for future intervention. We share these results as a potential tool for other programs.

Addressing a Gap in Healthcare Access for Transition-Age Youth with Autism: A Pilot Educational Intervention for Family Nurse Practitioner Students.

A mixed-methods randomized controlled trial pilot study evaluated an educational curriculum focused on the medical needs of transition-age youth (TAY) with autism (ASD) for family nurse practitioner students. Fourteen out of a cohort of 16 (87.5%) nursing students consented to participate in the study and were randomly assigned to either a waitlist control group (WLC) (n = 8) or an intervention group (INT) (n = 6). Three measures were used to determine pre- and post-intervention levels of self-efficacy, knowledge, and attitudes. Quantitative and qualitative data provide preliminary support that participation in intervention may improve and enhance knowledge and level of self-efficacy in working with TAY with ASD.